Freedom of Navigation Recognized, but Misuse of the Principle Raises Concern

After China claimed that it has overlapping rights within the Philippinesโ€™ ๐„๐ฑ๐œ๐ฅ๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ข๐ฏ๐ž ๐„๐œ๐จ๐ง๐จ๐ฆ๐ข๐œ ๐™๐จ๐ง๐ž (๐„๐„๐™), Philippine Coast Guard Spokesperson for the West Philippine Sea ๐‘๐ž๐š๐ซ ๐€๐๐ฆ๐ข๐ซ๐š๐ฅ ๐‰๐š๐ฒ ๐“๐š๐ซ๐ซ๐ข๐ž๐ฅ๐š responded in a Facebook post, stressing that all nations are entitled to freedom of navigation in the South China Sea without needing permission from any state.

He emphasized that freedom of navigation itself is not the issue at the center of the conflict. He argued that Chinaโ€™s activities within the Philippinesโ€™ EEZ should not be viewed as legitimate freedom of navigation, but rather as unlawful patrol operations inconsistent with the ๐”๐ง๐ข๐ญ๐ž๐ ๐๐š๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง๐ฌ ๐‚๐จ๐ง๐ฏ๐ž๐ง๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐จ๐ง ๐ญ๐ก๐ž ๐‹๐š๐ฐ ๐จ๐Ÿ ๐ญ๐ก๐ž ๐’๐ž๐š (๐”๐๐‚๐‹๐Ž๐’).

Source: